idnits 2.17.00 (12 Aug 2021) /tmp/idnits50796/draft-ietf-simple-prescaps-ext-01.txt: Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** It looks like you're using RFC 3978 boilerplate. You should update this to the boilerplate described in the IETF Trust License Policy document (see https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info), which is required now. -- Found old boilerplate from RFC 3667, Section 5.1 on line 16. -- Found old boilerplate from RFC 3978, Section 5.5 on line 954. -- Found old boilerplate from RFC 3979, Section 5, paragraph 1 on line 931. -- Found old boilerplate from RFC 3979, Section 5, paragraph 2 on line 938. -- Found old boilerplate from RFC 3979, Section 5, paragraph 3 on line 944. ** Found boilerplate matching RFC 3978, Section 5.4, paragraph 1 (on line 960), which is fine, but *also* found old RFC 2026, Section 10.4C, paragraph 1 text on line 38. ** The document seems to lack an RFC 3978 Section 5.1 IPR Disclosure Acknowledgement -- however, there's a paragraph with a matching beginning. Boilerplate error? ** This document has an original RFC 3978 Section 5.4 Copyright Line, instead of the newer IETF Trust Copyright according to RFC 4748. ** This document has an original RFC 3978 Section 5.5 Disclaimer, instead of the newer disclaimer which includes the IETF Trust according to RFC 4748. ** The document uses RFC 3667 boilerplate or RFC 3978-like boilerplate instead of verbatim RFC 3978 boilerplate. After 6 May 2005, submission of drafts without verbatim RFC 3978 boilerplate is not accepted. The following non-3978 patterns matched text found in the document. That text should be removed or replaced: By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed, or will be disclosed, and any of which I become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with RFC 3668. Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- == No 'Intended status' indicated for this document; assuming Proposed Standard Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** There is 1 instance of lines with control characters in the document. Miscellaneous warnings: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- == The copyright year in the RFC 3978 Section 5.4 Copyright Line does not match the current year == Line 48 has weird spacing: '...tension to re...' == Line 266 has weird spacing: '...element indic...' == Line 276 has weird spacing: '...element indic...' == Line 694 has weird spacing: '...element name=...' == Line 709 has weird spacing: '...element name=...' == (2 more instances...) == The document seems to lack the recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate, even if it appears to use RFC 2119 keywords. (The document does seem to have the reference to RFC 2119 which the ID-Checklist requires). -- The document seems to lack a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but may have content which was first submitted before 10 November 2008. If you have contacted all the original authors and they are all willing to grant the BCP78 rights to the IETF Trust, then this is fine, and you can ignore this comment. If not, you may need to add the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer. (See the Legal Provisions document at https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info for more information.) -- The document date (May 7, 2004) is 6587 days in the past. Is this intentional? Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative references to lower-maturity documents in RFCs) == Unused Reference: '10' is defined on line 867, but no explicit reference was found in the text == Unused Reference: '12' is defined on line 874, but no explicit reference was found in the text == Unused Reference: '14' is defined on line 881, but no explicit reference was found in the text == Unused Reference: '16' is defined on line 888, but no explicit reference was found in the text == Unused Reference: '18' is defined on line 896, but no explicit reference was found in the text == Unused Reference: '19' is defined on line 899, but no explicit reference was found in the text ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 2778 (ref. '2') ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 2779 (ref. '3') == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf has been published as RFC 3863 == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-impp-pres has been published as RFC 3859 == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-sip-callee-caps has been published as RFC 3840 == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-sip-callerprefs has been published as RFC 3841 == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-impp-im has been published as RFC 3860 -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 3265 (ref. '13') (Obsoleted by RFC 6665) == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-simple-presence has been published as RFC 3856 -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 2327 (ref. '15') (Obsoleted by RFC 4566) -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 1766 (ref. '18') (Obsoleted by RFC 3066, RFC 3282) -- Duplicate reference: RFC2046, mentioned in '19', was also mentioned in '16'. Summary: 9 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 21 warnings (==), 11 comments (--). Run idnits with the --verbose option for more detailed information about the items above. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 SIMPLE WG M. Lonnfors 3 Internet-Draft K. Kiss 4 Expires: November 5, 2004 Nokia 5 May 7, 2004 7 User Agent Capability Extension to Presence Information Data Format 8 (PIDF) 9 draft-ietf-simple-prescaps-ext-01 11 Status of this Memo 13 By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable 14 patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed, 15 and any of which I become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with 16 RFC 3668. 18 Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering 19 Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that 20 other groups may also distribute working documents as 21 Internet-Drafts. 23 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months 24 and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any 25 time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference 26 material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." 28 The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at 29 http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. 31 The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at 32 http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. 34 This Internet-Draft will expire on November 5, 2004. 36 Copyright Notice 38 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved. 40 Abstract 42 Interoperation of Instant Messaging and Presence systems has been 43 defined in the IMPP working group. The IMPP WG has come up with 44 baseline interoperable operations and formats for presence and 45 instant messaging systems. However, these base formats might need 46 standardized extensions in order to enable building rational 47 applications using presence and instant messaging. This memo 48 proposes an extension to represent "Indicating User Agent 49 Capabilities in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)" capabilities 50 in the Presence Information Document Format (PIDF) compliant presence 51 documents. 53 Table of Contents 55 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 56 1.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 57 1.2 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 58 2. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 59 3. Extension for "Indicating User Agent Capabilities in the 60 Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)" in PIDF documents . . . . 5 61 3.1 Extension overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 62 3.2 element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 63 3.3